From: | Alena Rybakina |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov |
Cc: | Robert Haas |
Subject: | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Date: | 2024-03-03 09:26:19 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I found that it was mentioned here -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACJufxFrZS07oBHMk1_c8P3A84VZ3ysXiZV8NeU6gAnvu%2BHsVA%40mail.gmail.com.
To be honest, I couldn't find any explanation for that.
On 01.03.2024 18:33, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Hi, Andrei,
> Hi, Alena!
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:59 AM Andrei Lepikhov
> wrote:
>
> On 28/2/2024 17:27, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> > Maybe like that:
> >
> > It also considers the way to generate a path using BitmapScan
> indexes,
> > converting the transformed expression into expressions separated
> by "OR"
> > operations, and if it turns out to be the best and finally
> selects the
> > best one.
> Thanks,
> I spent some time describing the feature with documentation.
> A condensed description of the GUC is in the runtime-config file.
> Feature description has spread between TransformOrExprToANY and
> generate_saop_pathlist routines.
> Also, I've made tiny changes in the code to look more smoothly.
> All modifications are integrated into the two new patches.
>
> Feel free to add, change or totally rewrite these changes.
>
>
> I'm going to review and revise the patch.
>
> One question I have yet.
>
> > /*
> > * Transformation only works with both side type is not
> > * { array | composite | domain | record }.
>
> Why do we limit transformation for these types? Also, it doesn't seem
> the current code restricts anything except composite/record.
>
> ------
> Regards,
> Alexander Korotkov
--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alena Rybakina | 2024-03-03 09:48:19 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-03-03 07:56:32 | RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |