Re: Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Konstantin Knizhnik
To: Serge Rielau
Cc: Pg Hackers , Doug Doole
Subject: Re: Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2017-04-25 20:47:44
Message-ID: [email protected]
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/25/2017 11:40 PM, Serge Rielau wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> SELECT ‘hello’::CHAR(10) || ‘World’, 5 + 6;
>>>
>>> You can substitute ‘hello’, ‘World’, 5, and 6. But not 10.
>>
>> I am substituting only string literals. So the query above will be transformed to
>>
>> SELECT $1::CHAR(10) || $2, 5 + 6;
>>
>> What's wrong with it?
>
> Oh, well that leaves a lot of opportunities on the table, doesn’t it?

Well, actually my primary intention was not to make badly designed programs (not using prepared statements) work faster.
I wanted to address cases when it is not possible to use prepared statements.
If we want to substitute with parameters as much literals as possible, then parse+deparse tree seems to be the only reasonable approach.
I will try to implement it also, just to estimate parsing overhead.

>
> Cheers
> Serge
>

--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-25 20:56:44 Re: StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions recovers subtrans links incorrectly
Previous Message Serge Rielau 2017-04-25 20:40:10 Re: Cached plans and statement generalization