use mn for roman numbers #75
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@NSoiffer I don't think there is anything contoversial here can I just merge to avoid conflicts down the line if more examples are added? |
|
I wouldn't use MathCAT as a justification for the change. I'm not sure it is a good idea read them as numbers. However, I do believe they were always meant to be in |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR switches the examples of
:roman-numeralto usemathvariant=normalto avoid italic.It also expands the English giving alternative readings as numbers, so
four hundredrather thanc d(which matches mathcat behaviour)https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/intent-examples/#IDRomanNumerals
I have assumed the double vinculm shown here multiplies by a million if that is the intention the
??here can be deleted.