[css-shapes] Clarify which are valid in shape-*

[cdoublev]

shape-outside (CSS Shapes 1) and shape-inside (CSS Shapes 2) are defined with this prose:

: The shape is computed based on the values of one of inset(), circle(), ellipse() or polygon().

It is not clear to me if xywh(), rect(), path(), should be invalid.

In SVG 2, is even further restricted in shape-inside and shape-substract, but I assume these are superseded by CSS Shapes.

^{This was previously reported in the multi-faceted issue #7390.}

[smfr]

I agree that clarification here is needed. I think all Basic Shapes should be allowed for all shape-accepting properties.

[tabatkins]

Agreed.

[css-meeting-bot]

The CSS Working Group just discussed [css-shapes] Clarify which `` are valid in `shape-*` , and agreed to the following:

• RESOLVED: Shapes Level 1 is modified to say that shape-outside takes all s
• RESOLVED: Publish a new CRD of Shapes 1 with this change (and whatever else is already in since last publication)

The full IRC log of that discussion

smfr: In Shapes 1 the spec says shape-outside accepts only a small list of functions
smfr: We have new shape functions now - xywh()/etc, shape(), path(), etc
smfr: Convenient would be to say that is all such shape functions
smfr: I think in imp we avoided path() in at first becuase it was hard to do the geometry to figure out where a line of text hit the boundary
smfr: But I think we just need to figure it out and make shapes work everywhere
astearns: Does this need to be in Level 1, or can it go to Level 2?
smfr: Woudl be a little weird for Level 2 to modify shape-outside here, but it could I guess?
astearns: No strong opinion eithe rway for me
astearns: makes sense to me
+1 from me
astearns: proposed resolution: Shapes Level 1 is modified to say that shape-outside takes all s
RESOLVED: Shapes Level 1 is modified to say that shape-outside takes all s
smfr: could i also ask for a new WD?
smfr: The ED changes the values accepted by circle()/ellipse() grammars too
astearns: I think this'll be a CRD at this point
astearns: Which is why I was thinking of putting it in l2, to be lazy
fantasai: It's not harder to publish a CRD than a WD
astearns: Do you want a resolution to publish now, or wait for the next issue?
smfr: next issue is definitely a l2 issue, let's do now
astearns: so proposed is: Publish a new CRD of Shapes 1 with this change (and whatever else is already in since last publication)
RESOLVED: Publish a new CRD of Shapes 1 with this change (and whatever else is already in since last publication)

[astearns]

Changes made in b53255a. I’ll keep this issue open until the shapes-1 is published.