You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems far more sensible to promote the first operand to cross-fade(100% A, B) so that it can be interpolated by just the percentage (cross-fade(x% A, B), x∈[p, 100]), which avoids redundant nesting.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Based on the currently proposed cross-fade() interpolation algorithm, the titular example would produce something like
cross-fade(x% A, cross-fade(p% A, B))
, x∈[0, 100].It seems far more sensible to promote the first operand to
cross-fade(100% A, B)
so that it can be interpolated by just the percentage (cross-fade(x% A, B)
, x∈[p, 100]), which avoids redundant nesting.Note that Chrome currently doesn't seem to handle this at all: http://dabblet.com/gist/efb891a971d4255e4a21bad677e4780c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: