[css-nesting-1] Position summary table

Co-Authored-By: fantasai <[email protected]>

Author: LeaVerou

css-nesting-1/proposals.md

@@ -107,4 +107,17 @@ Arguments for each of the above options:
 - Can't mix properties and rules - all properties have to come first. (But this matches the data model anyway.)
 - If you are *only* nesting rules, you still need an empty declaration block (`{}`), which looks awkward
 
-table>
+table>
+
+## Discussion Participant Positions
+
+Add your name and preferred proposals below:
+
+| Participant | Top choice | Runner-up | Third choice |
+|-------------|------------|-----------|--------------|
+| fantasai    | 3 or 4.ii or 4.iii | 2.ii or 2.iii | |
+| LeaVerou    | 3          | 2.iii     | 2.ii |
+
+Note: It is not required to be a WG member to add your name to this list,
+only to have followed the [discussion](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834)
+and considered the proposals (summarized above) carefully.