Skip to content

Commit 9d9b1a6

Browse files
author
Raphael Kubo da Costa
committed
Clean up Bikeshed metadata
- Remove custom "Bug Reports" key, this is added automatically by the "Repository" key (i.e. there is a "GitHub" link under "Feedback"). - "Test Suite" is a valid key in Bikeshed, so there is no need to declare it as custom. Follow Bikeshed's documentation and provide a URL rather than a `` block. - Remove custom Conformance section, let Bikeshed generate it from `dap`'s boilerplate in Bikeshed's spec-data. - There is no need to explicitly tell Bikeshed not to include an issues index, as Bikeshed does not add it due to the lack of an "issues" class in CSS.
1 parent 8c0d229 commit 9d9b1a6

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-23
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-23
lines changed

index.bs

Lines changed: 1 addition & 23 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -23,14 +23,12 @@ Status Text:
2323
Architecture Group review for this specification to account for the latest
2424
architectural review practices.
2525
Version History: https://github.com/w3c/ambient-light/commits/main/index.bs
26-
2726
Indent: 2
2827
Repository: w3c/ambient-light
2928
Markup Shorthands: markdown on
3029
Inline Github Issues: off
3130
!Issue Tracking: Level 2 Issues
32-
33-
Boilerplate: omit issues-index, omit conformance
31+
Test Suite: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/ambient-light
3432
Default Biblio Status: current
3533
3634
@@ -307,23 +305,3 @@ Paul Bakaus for the LightLevelSensor idea.
307305
Mikhail Pozdnyakov and Alexander Shalamov for the use cases and requirements.
308306

309307
Lukasz Olejnik for the privacy risk assessment.
310-
311-
Conformance {#conformance}
312-
===========
313-
314-
Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of
315-
descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words "MUST",
316-
"MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
317-
"RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in the normative parts of this
318-
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
319-
However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase
320-
letters in this specification.
321-
322-
All of the text of this specification is normative except sections
323-
explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [[!RFC2119]]
324-
325-
A conformant user agent must implement all the requirements
326-
listed in this specification that are applicable to user agents.
327-
328-
The IDL fragments in this specification must be interpreted as required for
329-
conforming IDL fragments, as described in the Web IDL specification. [[!WEBIDL]]

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)