While converting expressions in an upper-level plan node so that they
reference Vars and expressions provided by the input plan node(s),
don't convert plain Const items, even if there happens to be a matching
Const in the input. It's silly to do so because a Var is more expensive to
execute than a Const. Moreover, converting can fool ExecCheckPlanOutput's
check that an insert or update query inserts nulls into dropped columns,
leading to "query provides a value for a dropped column" errors during
INSERT or UPDATE on a table with a dropped column. We could solve this
by making that check more complicated, but I don't see the point; this fix
should save a marginal number of cycles, and it also makes for less messy
EXPLAIN output, as shown by the ensuing regression test result changes.
Per report from Pavel Hanák. I have not incorporated a test case based
on that example, as there doesn't seem to be a simple way of checking
this in isolation without making a bunch of assumptions about other
planner and SQL-function behavior.
Back-patch to 9.6. This setrefs.c behavior exists much further back,
but there is not currently reason to think that it causes problems
before 9.6.
Discussion: <
[email protected]>
Var *oldvar = (Var *) tle->expr;
Var *newvar;
+ /*
+ * As in search_indexed_tlist_for_non_var(), we prefer to keep Consts
+ * as Consts, not Vars referencing Consts. Here, there's no speed
+ * advantage to be had, but it makes EXPLAIN output look cleaner, and
+ * again it avoids confusing the executor.
+ */
+ if (IsA(oldvar, Const))
+ {
+ /* just reuse the existing TLE node */
+ output_targetlist = lappend(output_targetlist, tle);
+ continue;
+ }
+
newvar = makeVar(OUTER_VAR,
tle->resno,
exprType((Node *) oldvar),
{
TargetEntry *tle;
+ /*
+ * If it's a simple Const, replacing it with a Var is silly, even if there
+ * happens to be an identical Const below; a Var is more expensive to
+ * execute than a Const. What's more, replacing it could confuse some
+ * places in the executor that expect to see simple Consts for, eg,
+ * dropped columns.
+ */
+ if (IsA(node, Const))
+ return NULL;
+
tle = tlist_member(node, itlist->tlist);
if (tle)
{
Sort Key: tenk1.thousand, tenk1.tenthous
-> Index Only Scan using tenk1_thous_tenthous on tenk1
-> Sort
- Sort Key: (42), (42)
+ Sort Key: 42, 42
-> Index Only Scan using tenk1_hundred on tenk1 tenk1_1
(6 rows)