This header hasn't changed recently, so the fact that it now fails
headerscheck/cpluspluscheck testing must be due to changes in what
it includes. Probably
f21916791 is to blame, but I didn't try to
verify that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
3699703.
1595016554@sss.pgh.pa.us
#include "catalog/pg_subscription.h"
#include "datatype/timestamp.h"
#include "storage/lock.h"
+#include "storage/spin.h"
+
typedef struct LogicalRepWorker
{