Add items for vacuum not having to wait for CONCURRENTLY, and
CONCURRENTLY not having to wait for other CONCURRENTLY operations.
Reported-by: Simon Riggs
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-EMM4nf7Ys-Yae_kY25dXT_3eiOXke2+yw44jgy+4jNsA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14 only
+
+ Allow vacuum to be more aggressive in removing dead rows during
+ minimal-locking index operations (Álvaro Herrera)
+
+
+ Specifically, CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and
+ REINDEX CONCURRENTLY no longer limit the dead
+ row removal of other relations.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Allow index commands using CONCURRENTLY to
+ avoid waiting for the completion of other operations using
+ CONCURRENTLY (Álvaro Herrera)
+
+
+