Historically we forbade datatype-specific comparison functions from
returning INT_MIN, so that it would be safe to invert the sort order
just by negating the comparison result. However, this was never
really safe for comparison functions that directly return the result
of memcmp(), strcmp(), etc, as POSIX doesn't place any such restriction
on those library functions. Buildfarm results show that at least on
recent Linux on s390x, memcmp() actually does return INT_MIN sometimes,
causing sort failures.
The agreed-on answer is to remove this restriction and fix relevant
call sites to not make such an assumption; code such as "res = -res"
should be replaced by "INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(res)". The same is needed
in a few places that just directly negated the result of memcmp or
strcmp.
To help find places having this problem, I've also added a compile option
to nbtcompare.c that causes some of the commonly used comparators to
return INT_MIN/INT_MAX instead of their usual -1/+1. It'd likely be
a good idea to have at least one buildfarm member running with
"-DSTRESS_SORT_INT_MIN". That's far from a complete test of course,
but it should help to prevent fresh introductions of such bugs.
This is a longstanding portability hazard, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
20180928185215[email protected]
ltree_level *bl = LTREE_FIRST(b);
int an = a->numlevel;
int bn = b->numlevel;
- int res = 0;
while (an > 0 && bn > 0)
{
+ int res;
+
if ((res = memcmp(al->name, bl->name, Min(al->len, bl->len))) == 0)
{
if (al->len != bl->len)
return (al->len - bl->len) * 10 * (an + 1);
}
else
+ {
+ if (res < 0)
+ res = -1;
+ else
+ res = 1;
return res * 10 * (an + 1);
+ }
an--;
bn--;
{
if (cl->len != pl->len)
return false;
- if (memcmp(cl->name, pl->name, cl->len))
+ if (memcmp(cl->name, pl->name, cl->len) != 0)
return false;
pn--;
* If they're both zero or positive, the normal comparison applies; if
* both negative, the sense is reversed.
*/
- if (sa == MP_ZPOS)
- return cmp;
- else
- return -cmp;
-
+ if (sa != MP_ZPOS)
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(cmp);
+ return cmp;
}
else
{
{
cmp = s_vcmp(z, value);
- if (vsign == MP_ZPOS)
- return cmp;
- else
- return -cmp;
+ if (vsign != MP_ZPOS)
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(cmp);
+ return cmp;
}
else
{
*
* The result is always an int32 regardless of the input datatype.
*
- * Although any negative int32 (except INT_MIN) is acceptable for reporting
- * "<", and any positive int32 is acceptable for reporting ">", routines
+ * Although any negative int32 is acceptable for reporting "<",
+ * and any positive int32 is acceptable for reporting ">", routines
* that work on 32-bit or wider datatypes can't just return "a - b".
- * That could overflow and give the wrong answer. Also, one must not
- * return INT_MIN to report "<", since some callers will negate the result.
+ * That could overflow and give the wrong answer.
*
* NOTE: it is critical that the comparison function impose a total order
* on all non-NULL values of the data type, and that the datatype's
* during an index access won't be recovered till end of query. This
* primarily affects comparison routines for toastable datatypes;
* they have to be careful to free any detoasted copy of an input datum.
+ *
+ * NOTE: we used to forbid comparison functions from returning INT_MIN,
+ * but that proves to be too error-prone because some platforms' versions
+ * of memcmp() etc can return INT_MIN. As a means of stress-testing
+ * callers, this file can be compiled with STRESS_SORT_INT_MIN defined
+ * to cause many of these functions to return INT_MIN or INT_MAX instead of
+ * their customary -1/+1. For production, though, that's not a good idea
+ * since users or third-party code might expect the traditional results.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
+#include
+
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/sortsupport.h"
+#ifdef STRESS_SORT_INT_MIN
+#define A_LESS_THAN_B INT_MIN
+#define A_GREATER_THAN_B INT_MAX
+#else
+#define A_LESS_THAN_B (-1)
+#define A_GREATER_THAN_B 1
+#endif
+
Datum
btboolcmp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
int32 b = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
static int
int32 b = DatumGetInt32(y);
if (a > b)
- return 1;
+ return A_GREATER_THAN_B;
else if (a == b)
return 0;
else
- return -1;
+ return A_LESS_THAN_B;
}
Datum
int64 b = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
static int
int64 b = DatumGetInt64(y);
if (a > b)
- return 1;
+ return A_GREATER_THAN_B;
else if (a == b)
return 0;
else
- return -1;
+ return A_LESS_THAN_B;
}
Datum
int64 b = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
int32 b = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
int32 b = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
int16 b = PG_GETARG_INT16(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
int64 b = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
int16 b = PG_GETARG_INT16(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
Datum
Oid b = PG_GETARG_OID(1);
if (a > b)
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else if (a == b)
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
static int
Oid b = DatumGetObjectId(y);
if (a > b)
- return 1;
+ return A_GREATER_THAN_B;
else if (a == b)
return 0;
else
- return -1;
+ return A_LESS_THAN_B;
}
Datum
if (a->values[i] != b->values[i])
{
if (a->values[i] > b->values[i])
- PG_RETURN_INT32(1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_GREATER_THAN_B);
else
- PG_RETURN_INT32(-1);
+ PG_RETURN_INT32(A_LESS_THAN_B);
}
}
PG_RETURN_INT32(0);
scankey->sk_argument));
if (!(scankey->sk_flags & SK_BT_DESC))
- result = -result;
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(result);
}
/* if the keys are unequal, return the difference */
cxt->collation,
da, db));
if (cxt->reverse)
- compare = -compare;
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
return compare;
}
subkey->sk_argument));
if (subkey->sk_flags & SK_BT_DESC)
- cmpresult = -cmpresult;
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(cmpresult);
/* Done comparing if unequal, else advance to next column */
if (cmpresult != 0)
datum2, isNull2,
sortKey);
if (compare != 0)
- return -compare;
+ {
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
+ return compare;
+ }
}
return 0;
}
ReorderTuple *rtb = (ReorderTuple *) b;
IndexScanState *node = (IndexScanState *) arg;
- return -cmp_orderbyvals(rta->orderbyvals, rta->orderbynulls,
- rtb->orderbyvals, rtb->orderbynulls,
- node);
+ /* exchange argument order to invert the sort order */
+ return cmp_orderbyvals(rtb->orderbyvals, rtb->orderbynulls,
+ rta->orderbyvals, rta->orderbynulls,
+ node);
}
/*
datum2, isNull2,
sortKey);
if (compare != 0)
- return -compare;
+ {
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
+ return compare;
+ }
}
return 0;
}
return -1;
if (fa->action == FILE_ACTION_REMOVE)
- return -strcmp(fa->path, fb->path);
+ return strcmp(fb->path, fa->path);
else
return strcmp(fa->path, fb->path);
}
* When a new operator class is declared, we require that the user
* supply us with an amproc procedure (BTORDER_PROC) for determining
* whether, for two keys a and b, a < b, a = b, or a > b. This routine
- * must return < 0, 0, > 0, respectively, in these three cases. (It must
- * not return INT_MIN, since we may negate the result before using it.)
+ * must return < 0, 0, > 0, respectively, in these three cases.
*
* To facilitate accelerated sorting, an operator class may choose to
* offer a second procedure (BTSORTSUPPORT_PROC). For full details, see
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
+/*
+ * Invert the sign of a qsort-style comparison result, ie, exchange negative
+ * and positive integer values, being careful not to get the wrong answer
+ * for INT_MIN. The argument should be an integral variable.
+ */
+#define INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(var) \
+ ((var) = ((var) < 0) ? 1 : -(var))
+
/*
* Use this, not "char buf[BLCKSZ]", to declare a field or local variable
* holding a page buffer, if that page might be accessed as a page and not
* Comparator function has the same API as the traditional btree
* comparison function, ie, return <0, 0, or >0 according as x is less
* than, equal to, or greater than y. Note that x and y are guaranteed
- * not null, and there is no way to return null either. Do not return
- * INT_MIN, as callers are allowed to negate the result before using it.
+ * not null, and there is no way to return null either.
*
* This may be either the authoritative comparator, or the abbreviated
* comparator. Core code may switch this over the initial preference of
{
compare = (*ssup->comparator) (datum1, datum2, ssup);
if (ssup->ssup_reverse)
- compare = -compare;
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
}
return compare;
{
compare = (*ssup->abbrev_full_comparator) (datum1, datum2, ssup);
if (ssup->ssup_reverse)
- compare = -compare;
+ INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
}
return compare;
projects / postgresql.git / commitdiff