Abstract
As a popular means of nonverbal communication in social media, emojis provide quick predictions about public sentiments towards social events. Previous analyses of emojis reported that people use positive emojis more frequently than negative emojis. However, psychological research reveals a negativity bias in sentiment, as seen in the phenomenon of loss-aversion, where negative sentiment due to a loss possesses a greater psychological valence than positive sentiment due to a gain of an equal amount. We propose that the frequency and intensity of emojis are dissociable. Whereas the frequency of emojis reflects social norms in public communication, the intensity reflects hedonic values and loss-aversion. We first developed a text-free emoji sentiment lexicon based on a survey with more than 900 users of Weibo (a Chinese version of Twitter). Using the sentiment lexicon, we then analyzed 8822 Weibo comments containing the indexed emojis in reaction to three controversial events (i.e., a murder case in which public opinion largely opposed the final verdict, a manslaughter case in which public opinion was supportive of the final verdict, and a public debate on an award-winning subject). The results showed that positive or negative emoji frequency was consistent with the majority sentiment (social norm) towards a controversial event. In contrast, the average intensity of negative emojis was stronger than positive emojis across all three samples, revealing a public sentiment version of loss-aversion. In all three samples, emoji polarity analysis served as a proxy for text sentiment analysis to capture public attitudes towards a social event.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Adobe Inc. (2019). Emoji Trend Report 2019: The Cultural Phenomenon of Emoji. https://digitalmarketingcommunity.com/researches/emojis-report-2019/
Alshenqeeti, H. (2016). Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.56
Azuma, J. (2012). Graphic emoticons as a future universal symbolic language. In A. Remael, P. Orero, & M. Carrolleds (Eds.), Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility at the Crossroads: Media for All 3 (Approaches to Translation Studies). Rodopi: Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
Barbieri, F., Ballesteros, M., & Saggion, H. (2017). Are emojis predictable? Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, 105–111.
Barrett, L. F. (2006a). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x
Barrett, L. F. (2006b). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Bermingham, A., & Smeaton, A. F. (2010). Classifying sentiment in microblogs: is brevity an advantage? Proceedings of the19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871741
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (2007). The measurement and stability of state citizen ideology. State Politics and Policy, 7(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700201
Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2
Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (2). . Addison-Wesley.
Chan, M., Wu, X., Hao, Y., Xi, R., & Jin, T. (2012). Microblogging, online expression, and political efficacy among young Chinese citizens: The moderating role of information and entertainment needs in the use of Weibo. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0109
Churches, O., Nicholls, M., Thiessen, M., Kohler, M., & Keage, H. (2014). Emoticons in mind: An event-related potential study. Social Neuroscience, 9(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.873737
Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1253
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In Ed. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being (pp. 213–231). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., et al. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411678112
Emoji Research Team (2016). Emoji Report. http://cdn.emogi.com/docs/reports/2016_emoji_report.pdf
Franco, C. L., & Fugate, J. M. (2020). Emoji face renderings: Exploring the role emoji platform differences have on Emotional Interpretation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00330-1
Gainous, J., Abbott, J. P., & Wagner, K. M. (2019). Traditional versus internet media in a restricted information environment: How trust in the medium matters. Political Behavior, 41, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6
Ganesan, K. A., Sundaresan, N., & Deo, H. (2008). Mining tag clouds and emotions behind community feedback. Proceedings of 17th the International Conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367716
Graham, M. W., Avery, E. J., & Park, S. (2015). The role of social media in local government crisis communications. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.001
Grobe, M. (2018, August 29). The origins of the smiley face and how it became a counter-cultural symbol. Highsnobiety. https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/smileyface-symbol-origins/
Jiang, Z., Ma, W., Zou, K., & Li, L. (2018). Research on emotion evolution of network public opinion based on sentiment orientation analysis (in Chinese). Journal of Modern Information, 38(4), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2018.04.007
Jungherr, A., Schoen, H., Posegga, O., & Jürgens, P. (2017). Digital trace data in the study of public opinion: An indicator of attention toward politics rather than political support. Social Science Computer Review, 35(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316631043
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Li, M., Chng, E., Chong, A., & See, S. (2019). An empirical analysis of emoji usage on Twitter. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(8), 1748–1763. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2019-0001
Ljubešić, N. & Fišer, D. (2016). A global analysis of emoji use. Proceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop and the EmpiriST Shared Task, 82–89, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-2610
Lo, S. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11(5), 595–597. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Mayshak, R., Sharman, S. J., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2016). The impact of negative online social network content on expressed sentiment, executive function, and working memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.002
Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2015). The Emerging Neuroscience of Social Media. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004
Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., Pasek, J., Cohen, J., Callegaro, M., & Harwood, P. (2014). Social media in public opinion research: Executive summary of the aapor task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu053
Norrander, B. (2007). Choosing among indicators of state public opinion. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7, 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700204
Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., & Mozetič, I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0144296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144296
Riordan, M. A. (2017). Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704238
Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.233
Shi, W., Wang, H., & He, S. (2013). Sentiment analysis of Chinese microblogging based on sentiment ontology: A case study of ‘7.23 WenzhouTrain Collision.’ Connection Science, 25(4), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2013.851172
Shiha, M., & Ayvaz, S. (2017). The effects of emoji in sentiment analysis. International Journal of Computer Electrical Engineering., 9(1), 360–369.
Shoeb, A. & de Melo, G. (2020). EmoTag1200: Understanding the Association between Emojis and Emotions. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 8957–8967.
Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x
Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media., 4(1), 178–185.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Ussama, Y., Soon Ae, C., Vijayalakshmi, A., & Jaideep, V. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on Twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
Wang, X. T. (2004). Self-framing of risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.454
Wang, X. T., & Johnson, J. G. (2012). A Tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(4), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027415
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the Chinese National Science Foundation under Grant Number NSFC 31971025 to the corresponding author and the university research fund [2020-KYLX04-29] to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article’s research, authorship, and publication.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Wang, X.T. Nonverbal communication with emojis in social media: dissociating hedonic intensity from frequency. Lang Resources & Evaluation 57, 323–342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-022-09611-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-022-09611-6
Keywords
Profiles
- X. T. Wang View author profile