Summary:
- Discussed use of Media Fragments in CSS3 Images
- RESOLVED: CSS3 Fonts will normatively address same-origin restriction issue.
- RESOLVED: Publish CSS3 Images as WD.
- Daniel Weck asked everyone to respond to / review emails about css3-speech.
- F2F location status update
- Discussed edits to charter's FXTF joint deliverables
- ChrisL will start errata document for CSS3 Color to address issues 1, 2 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jul/0025.html
- CSS3 Writing Modes and text orientation will be discussed next week.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jul/0004.html
====== Full minutes below ======
Present:
Tab Atkins (late)
David Baron
Kimberly Blessing
Bert Bos
John Daggett
Arron Eicholz
Elika Etemad
Simon Fraser
Sylvain Galineau (late)
Koji Ishii
John Jansen
Brad Kemper
Chris Lilley
Peter Linss
Divya Manian (Opera Software)
Alex Mogilevsky
Florian Rivoal
David Singer
Daniel Weck
Steve Zilles
logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/07/06-css-irc I cannot make it today.
As for an update. Bert is not around so FPWD request for CSSOM has
not been made yet. I suppose I could do that myself, but not before
this week is over.
Hi Anne, I'm back.
lol
I'm just finishing the e-mail to plh and [email protected] about CSSOM
anne: you dismissed most of my proposals (css om issues) but they
are REALLY needed for content editors
and I disagree with them dismissed if the WG has no opportunity
to discuss them
you just have no idea how important they are for editors
Why is the WG not discussing them then?
That's what the mailing list is for, no?
because that's my job to ask the WG to discuss them during a conf
call ?
Also, I'm somewhat familiar with editors. A lot of my friends are
involved with writing editors of some kind.
I was waiting for your input first
good ; when they reach their 6th or 7th one, let me know :-)
Wouldn't it be better to discuss this on the list?
well, yes, but your mail just closed the discussion, it's too firm
you're the editor, not the decider
I think Xopus has about four major iterations. Not sure about Silk.
Well if people disagree they should feel free to say so, certainly.
or agree
I just don't think CSSOM is at the stage where we should add features.
Well, more features.
I just disagree at least for the disabled attribute on and