- From: Carlos Viegas Dam?sio <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:58:48 +0100
- To: <[email protected]>
- Message-ID: <01dd01c39324$74ffc210$dc9e17c3@pccd>
Dear editors,
In the current draft of RFC-2396bis the resolution of relative
references handles
the “abnormal examples” differently.
I quote the following from the abnormal examples section in RFC 2396
bis:
Parsers must be careful in handling the case where there are more
relative path ".." segments than there are hierarchical levels in the
base URI's path. Note that the ".." syntax cannot be used to change
the authority component of a URI.
"../../../g" = "http://a/g"
"../../../../g" = "http://a/g"
which is different from RFC 2396:
Parsers must be careful in handling the case where there are more
relative path ".." segments than there are hierarchical levels in the
base URI's path. Note that the ".." syntax cannot be used to change
the authority component of a URI.
../../../g = http://a/../g
../../../../g = http://a/../../g
This affects test case xmlbase/test012.rdf. Which one should be
followed?
Best regards,
Carlos Viegas Dam?sio
Carlos Viegas Dam?sio (Prof. Auxiliar) | Tel: +351-21-294 8536
(ext.10758)
Departamento de Inform?tica | Fax: +351-21-294 8541
Fac. de Ci?ncias e Tecnologia da |
Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
Qta. da Torre - 2829-516 Caparica | e-mail: [email protected]
PORTUGAL |
http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~cd
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:07:26 UTC