- From: Brian McBride <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:56:20 +0000
- To: [email protected]
- CC: [email protected]
Jo,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000JulSep/0006.html
you raised an issue with the RDF M&S spec which was recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-desc-clarity
as
The language in section 6 describing the formal grammar is unclear.
On the 26th October 2001, the WG resolved this issue
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0595.html
This issue is closed on the grounds that it is resolved by the new
approach taken to defining the syntax.
Basically, what this means is that the WG are rewriting the syntax documents
from scratch and using a technique based on an infoset grammar to describe the
syntax, which addresses the lack of clarity of the original syntax
specification. You can find a current WD of the new syntax document and a
pointer to our other specifications at:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/
Please can you respond to this message, copying [email protected] stating
whether this is an acceptable resolution of the issue.
Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 07:01:21 UTC