Fix inconsistency in comments atop ExecParallelEstimate.

When this code was initially introduced in commit d1b7c1ff, the structure
used was SharedPlanStateInstrumentation, but later when it got changed to
Instrumentation structure in commit b287df70, we forgot to update the
comment.

Reported-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
index cabe9fd0bef4838d9c5a63c65855d272b9fc9397..e65826560e72871413c5500ed39c2a87504cc945 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ ExecSerializePlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
  * shm_toc_estimate_keys on &pcxt->estimator.
  *
  * While we're at it, count the number of PlanState nodes in the tree, so
- * we know how many SharedPlanStateInstrumentation structures we need.
+ * we know how many Instrumentation structures we need.
  */
 static bool
 ExecParallelEstimate(PlanState *planstate, ExecParallelEstimateContext *e)