doc: Mention CASCADE/RESTRICT for DROP STATISTICS

This grammar has no effect as there are no dependencies on statistics,
but it is supported by the parser.  This is more consistent with the
other DROP commands.

Author: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1LA=yNmzcSfy+0oe6CEAgsxXRf_-UutE3ZncFi8QkFNQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 10

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml
index f58c3d6d22172d653580c379002c6b873ead3cf3..1532ca95847e3f3dfc6f62ac3c010030dee075a7 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_statistics.sgml
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PostgreSQL documentation
 
  
 
-DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name [, ...]
+DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name [, ...] [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ]
 
  
 
@@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ DROP STATISTICS [ IF EXISTS ] name
     
    
 
+   
+    CASCADE
+    RESTRICT
+
+    
+     
+      These key words do not have any effect, since there are no dependencies
+      on statistics.
+     
+    
+   
+