Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent

We say 'OWNER TO' in the synopsis; let's use that form elsewhere.

There is a paragraph in the  section that refers to various
subcommands very loosely (including OWNER); I didn't think it was an
improvement to change that one.

This is a fairly inconsequential change, so no backpatch.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/69ec7b51-03e5-f523-95ce-c070ee790e70@lab.ntt.co.jp

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
index 68393d70b4127d66be639cb18f700925db359ebe..b4b8dab91123584bc6d561fb530bce69114829eb 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ] name
    
 
    
-    OWNER
+    OWNER TO
     
      
       This form changes the owner of the table, sequence, view, materialized view,