Similarly to what was done in
04539e73f, we standardized on SQL being
pronounced "es-que-ell" rather than "sequel" in our documentation.
Two inconsistencies have crept in during the v15 cycle. The others
existed before but were missed in
04539e73f due to none of the searches
accounting for "SQL" being wrapped in tags.
As with
04539e73f, we don't touch code comments here in order to not
create unnecessary back-patching pain.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpML27UqFXnrYO1MJddsKVMQoiZisPvsAGhKE_tsKXquw%40mail.gmail.com
Defines whether to wrap a returned sequence of
SQL/JSON
- items into a
SQL/JSON array.
+ items into a
n SQL/JSON array.
Description
- The JSON_SERIALIZE function transforms a SQL/JSON value
+ The JSON_SERIALIZE function transforms an SQL/JSON value
into a character or binary string.
At the REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE
transaction isolation level this would cause a serialization failure (with
- a SQLSTATE of '40001'), so there is
+ an SQLSTATE of '40001'), so there is
no possibility of receiving rows out of order under these isolation levels.
If the final SELECT or RETURNING
- clause in a
SQL function does not return exactly
+ clause in a
n SQL function does not return exactly
the function's declared result
type,
PostgreSQL will automatically cast
the value to the required type, if that is possible with an implicit