-
+
Server Configuration
- However, using fsync results in a
- performance penalty: when a transaction is committed,
-
PostgreSQL must wait for the
- operating system to flush the write-ahead log to disk. When
- fsync is disabled, the operating system is
- allowed to do its best in buffering, ordering, and delaying
- writes. This can result in significantly improved performance.
- However, if the system crashes, the results of the last few
- committed transactions might be completely lost, or worse,
- might appear partially committed, leaving the database in an
- inconsistent state. In the
- worst case, unrecoverable data corruption might occur.
- (Crashes of the database software itself are not>
- a risk factor here. Only an operating-system-level crash
- creates a risk of corruption.)
+ While turning off fsync is often a performance
+ benefit, this can result in unrecoverable data corruption in
+ the event of an unexpected system shutdown or crash. Thus it
+ is only advisable to turn off fsync if
+ you can easily recreate your entire database from external
+ data.
- Due to the risks involved, there is no universally correct
- setting for fsync. Some administrators
- always disable fsync, while others only
- turn it off during initial bulk data loads, where there is a clear
- restart point if something goes wrong. Others
- always leave fsync enabled. The default is
- to enable fsync, for maximum reliability.
- If you trust your operating system, your hardware, and your
- utility company (or your battery backup), you can consider
- disabling fsync.
+ Examples of safe circumstances for turning off
+ fsync include the initial loading a new
+ database cluster from a backup file, using a database cluster
+ for processing statistics on an hourly basis which is then
+ recreated, or for a reporting read-only database clone which
+ gets recreated frequently and is not used for failover. High
+ quality hardware alone is not a sufficient justification for
+ turning off fsync.
Turning this parameter off speeds normal operation, but
- might lead to a corrupt database after an operating system crash
- or power failure. The risks are similar to turning off
- fsync>, though smaller. It might be safe to turn off
- this parameter if you have hardware (such as a battery-backed disk
- controller) or file-system software that reduces
- the risk of partial page writes to an acceptably low level (e.g., ZFS).
+ might lead to either unrecoverable data corruption, or silent
+ data corruption, after a system failure. The risks are similar to turning off
+ fsync, though smaller, and it should be turned off
+ only based on the same circumstances recommended for that parameter.