Add security checks to selectivity estimation functions
authorPeter Eisentraut
Fri, 5 May 2017 16:18:48 +0000 (12:18 -0400)
committerPeter Eisentraut
Mon, 8 May 2017 13:19:23 +0000 (09:19 -0400)
Some selectivity estimation functions run user-supplied operators over
data obtained from pg_statistic without security checks, which allows
those operators to leak pg_statistic data without having privileges on
the underlying tables.  Fix by checking that one of the following is
satisfied: (1) the user has table or column privileges on the table
underlying the pg_statistic data, or (2) the function implementing the
user-supplied operator is leak-proof.  If neither is satisfied, planning
will proceed as if there are no statistics available.

At least one of these is satisfied in most cases in practice.  The only
situations that are negatively impacted are user-defined or
not-leak-proof operators on a security-barrier view.

Reported-by: Robert Haas
Author: Peter Eisentraut 
Author: Tom Lane 

Security: CVE-2017-7484

doc/src/sgml/planstats.sgml
src/backend/utils/adt/array_selfuncs.c
src/backend/utils/adt/rangetypes_selfuncs.c
src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c
src/include/utils/selfuncs.h
src/test/regress/expected/privileges.out
src/test/regress/sql/privileges.sql

index 1a482d37f475ad319a7c3becb581a29a82f803c4..c667899e28dc3a8fbaba667a05ab0d351d66d241 100644 (file)
@@ -448,4 +448,64 @@ rows = (outer_cardinality * inner_cardinality) * selectivity
 
  
 
+  Planner Statistics and Security
+
+  
+   Access to the table pg_statistic is restricted to
+   superusers, so that ordinary users cannot learn about the contents of the
+   tables of other users from it.  Some selectivity estimation functions will
+   use a user-provided operator (either the operator appearing in the query or
+   a related operator) to analyze the stored statistics.  For example, in order
+   to determine whether a stored most common value is applicable, the
+   selectivity estimator will have to run the appropriate =
+   operator to compare the constant in the query to the stored value.
+   Thus the data in pg_statistic is potentially
+   passed to user-defined operators.  An appropriately crafted operator can
+   intentionally leak the passed operands (for example, by logging them
+   or writing them to a different table), or accidentally leak them by showing
+   their values in error messages, in either case possibly exposing data from
+   pg_statistic to a user who should not be able to
+   see it.
+  
+
+  
+   In order to prevent this, the following applies to all built-in selectivity
+   estimation functions.  When planning a query, in order to be able to use
+   stored statistics, the current user must either
+   have SELECT privilege on the table or the involved
+   columns, or the operator used must be LEAKPROOF (more
+   accurately, the function that the operator is based on).  If not, then the
+   selectivity estimator will behave as if no statistics are available, and
+   the planner will proceed with default or fall-back assumptions.
+  
+
+  
+   If a user does not have the required privilege on the table or columns,
+   then in many cases the query will ultimately receive a permission-denied
+   error, in which case this mechanism is invisible in practice.  But if the
+   user is reading from a security-barrier view, then the planner might wish
+   to check the statistics of an underlying table that is otherwise
+   inaccessible to the user.  In that case, the operator should be leak-proof
+   or the statistics will not be used.  There is no direct feedback about
+   that, except that the plan might be suboptimal.  If one suspects that this
+   is the case, one could try running the query as a more privileged user,
+   to see if a different plan results.
+  
+
+  
+   This restriction applies only to cases where the planner would need to
+   execute a user-defined operator on one or more values
+   from pg_statistic.  Thus the planner is permitted
+   to use generic statistical information, such as the fraction of null values
+   or the number of distinct values in a column, regardless of access
+   privileges.
+  
+
+  
+   Selectivity estimation functions contained in third-party extensions that
+   potentially operate on statistics with user-defined operators should follow
+   the same security rules.  Consult the PostgreSQL source code for guidance.
+  
 
index 4cb5f419321ee704874f3c51fbbc23522d55b940..1fe3059b4c5456f97ee456b669a4142045a1de4e 100644 (file)
@@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ scalararraysel_containment(PlannerInfo *root,
        useOr = !useOr;
 
    /* Get array element stats for var, if available */
-   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata.statsTuple))
+   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata.statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(&vardata, cmpfunc->fn_oid))
    {
        Form_pg_statistic stats;
        Datum      *values;
@@ -363,7 +364,8 @@ calc_arraycontsel(VariableStatData *vardata, Datum constval,
     */
    array = DatumGetArrayTypeP(constval);
 
-   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple))
+   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata, cmpfunc->fn_oid))
    {
        Form_pg_statistic stats;
        Datum      *values;
index 6d2a72f2fd9b02d31f3f6040f510a46787d4d720..f356b40bd17501fe44c5966f34ba76ee69fd8268 100644 (file)
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ calc_rangesel(TypeCacheEntry *typcache, VariableStatData *vardata,
            if (nnumbers != 1)
                elog(ERROR, "invalid empty fraction statistic");        /* shouldn't happen */
            empty_frac = numbers[0];
+           free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype, NULL, 0, numbers, nnumbers);
        }
        else
        {
@@ -383,6 +384,15 @@ calc_hist_selectivity(TypeCacheEntry *typcache, VariableStatData *vardata,
    bool        empty;
    double      hist_selec;
 
+   /* Can't use the histogram with insecure range support functions */
+   if (!statistic_proc_security_check(vardata,
+                                      typcache->rng_cmp_proc_finfo.fn_oid))
+       return -1;
+   if (OidIsValid(typcache->rng_subdiff_finfo.fn_oid) &&
+       !statistic_proc_security_check(vardata,
+                                      typcache->rng_subdiff_finfo.fn_oid))
+       return -1;
+
    /* Try to get histogram of ranges */
    if (!(HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
          get_attstatsslot(vardata->statsTuple,
@@ -420,11 +430,19 @@ calc_hist_selectivity(TypeCacheEntry *typcache, VariableStatData *vardata,
                               NULL,
                               &length_hist_values, &length_nhist,
                               NULL, NULL)))
+       {
+           free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype, hist_values, nhist, NULL, 0);
            return -1.0;
+       }
 
        /* check that it's a histogram, not just a dummy entry */
        if (length_nhist < 2)
+       {
+           free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype,
+                             length_hist_values, length_nhist, NULL, 0);
+           free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype, hist_values, nhist, NULL, 0);
            return -1.0;
+       }
    }
 
    /* Extract the bounds of the constant value. */
@@ -560,6 +578,10 @@ calc_hist_selectivity(TypeCacheEntry *typcache, VariableStatData *vardata,
            break;
    }
 
+   free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype,
+                     length_hist_values, length_nhist, NULL, 0);
+   free_attstatsslot(vardata->atttype, hist_values, nhist, NULL, 0);
+
    return hist_selec;
 }
 
index 0f10df79b7fa9934aefa97907389ef0a4a6a325e..da963689c56de77cb4752fd3486b5dec33681191 100644 (file)
 #include "catalog/pg_type.h"
 #include "executor/executor.h"
 #include "mb/pg_wchar.h"
+#include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "nodes/makefuncs.h"
 #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h"
 #include "optimizer/clauses.h"
 #include "parser/parse_clause.h"
 #include "parser/parse_coerce.h"
 #include "parser/parsetree.h"
+#include "utils/acl.h"
 #include "utils/builtins.h"
 #include "utils/bytea.h"
 #include "utils/date.h"
@@ -263,6 +265,7 @@ var_eq_const(VariableStatData *vardata, Oid operator,
 {
    double      selec;
    bool        isdefault;
+   Oid         opfuncoid;
 
    /*
     * If the constant is NULL, assume operator is strict and return zero, ie,
@@ -281,7 +284,9 @@ var_eq_const(VariableStatData *vardata, Oid operator,
    if (vardata->isunique && vardata->rel && vardata->rel->tuples >= 1.0)
        return 1.0 / vardata->rel->tuples;
 
-   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple))
+   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata,
+                                     (opfuncoid = get_opcode(operator))))
    {
        Form_pg_statistic stats;
        Datum      *values;
@@ -309,7 +314,7 @@ var_eq_const(VariableStatData *vardata, Oid operator,
        {
            FmgrInfo    eqproc;
 
-           fmgr_info(get_opcode(operator), &eqproc);
+           fmgr_info(opfuncoid, &eqproc);
 
            for (i = 0; i < nvalues; i++)
            {
@@ -615,6 +620,7 @@ mcv_selectivity(VariableStatData *vardata, FmgrInfo *opproc,
    sumcommon = 0.0;
 
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata, opproc->fn_oid) &&
        get_attstatsslot(vardata->statsTuple,
                         vardata->atttype, vardata->atttypmod,
                         STATISTIC_KIND_MCV, InvalidOid,
@@ -691,6 +697,7 @@ histogram_selectivity(VariableStatData *vardata, FmgrInfo *opproc,
    Assert(min_hist_size > 2 * n_skip);
 
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata, opproc->fn_oid) &&
        get_attstatsslot(vardata->statsTuple,
                         vardata->atttype, vardata->atttypmod,
                         STATISTIC_KIND_HISTOGRAM, InvalidOid,
@@ -768,6 +775,7 @@ ineq_histogram_selectivity(PlannerInfo *root,
     * the reverse way if isgt is TRUE.
     */
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata, opproc->fn_oid) &&
        get_attstatsslot(vardata->statsTuple,
                         vardata->atttype, vardata->atttypmod,
                         STATISTIC_KIND_HISTOGRAM, InvalidOid,
@@ -2208,6 +2216,7 @@ eqjoinsel_inner(Oid operator,
    double      nd2;
    bool        isdefault1;
    bool        isdefault2;
+   Oid         opfuncoid;
    Form_pg_statistic stats1 = NULL;
    Form_pg_statistic stats2 = NULL;
    bool        have_mcvs1 = false;
@@ -2224,30 +2233,36 @@ eqjoinsel_inner(Oid operator,
    nd1 = get_variable_numdistinct(vardata1, &isdefault1);
    nd2 = get_variable_numdistinct(vardata2, &isdefault2);
 
+   opfuncoid = get_opcode(operator);
+
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata1->statsTuple))
    {
+       /* note we allow use of nullfrac regardless of security check */
        stats1 = (Form_pg_statistic) GETSTRUCT(vardata1->statsTuple);
-       have_mcvs1 = get_attstatsslot(vardata1->statsTuple,
-                                     vardata1->atttype,
-                                     vardata1->atttypmod,
-                                     STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
-                                     InvalidOid,
-                                     NULL,
-                                     &values1, &nvalues1,
-                                     &numbers1, &nnumbers1);
+       if (statistic_proc_security_check(vardata1, opfuncoid))
+           have_mcvs1 = get_attstatsslot(vardata1->statsTuple,
+                                         vardata1->atttype,
+                                         vardata1->atttypmod,
+                                         STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
+                                         InvalidOid,
+                                         NULL,
+                                         &values1, &nvalues1,
+                                         &numbers1, &nnumbers1);
    }
 
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata2->statsTuple))
    {
+       /* note we allow use of nullfrac regardless of security check */
        stats2 = (Form_pg_statistic) GETSTRUCT(vardata2->statsTuple);
-       have_mcvs2 = get_attstatsslot(vardata2->statsTuple,
-                                     vardata2->atttype,
-                                     vardata2->atttypmod,
-                                     STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
-                                     InvalidOid,
-                                     NULL,
-                                     &values2, &nvalues2,
-                                     &numbers2, &nnumbers2);
+       if (statistic_proc_security_check(vardata2, opfuncoid))
+           have_mcvs2 = get_attstatsslot(vardata2->statsTuple,
+                                         vardata2->atttype,
+                                         vardata2->atttypmod,
+                                         STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
+                                         InvalidOid,
+                                         NULL,
+                                         &values2, &nvalues2,
+                                         &numbers2, &nnumbers2);
    }
 
    if (have_mcvs1 && have_mcvs2)
@@ -2281,7 +2296,7 @@ eqjoinsel_inner(Oid operator,
        int         i,
                    nmatches;
 
-       fmgr_info(get_opcode(operator), &eqproc);
+       fmgr_info(opfuncoid, &eqproc);
        hasmatch1 = (bool *) palloc0(nvalues1 * sizeof(bool));
        hasmatch2 = (bool *) palloc0(nvalues2 * sizeof(bool));
 
@@ -2424,6 +2439,7 @@ eqjoinsel_inner(Oid operator,
  *
  * (Also used for anti join, which we are supposed to estimate the same way.)
  * Caller has ensured that vardata1 is the LHS variable.
+ * Unlike eqjoinsel_inner, we have to cope with operator being InvalidOid.
  */
 static double
 eqjoinsel_semi(Oid operator,
@@ -2435,6 +2451,7 @@ eqjoinsel_semi(Oid operator,
    double      nd2;
    bool        isdefault1;
    bool        isdefault2;
+   Oid         opfuncoid;
    Form_pg_statistic stats1 = NULL;
    bool        have_mcvs1 = false;
    Datum      *values1 = NULL;
@@ -2450,6 +2467,8 @@ eqjoinsel_semi(Oid operator,
    nd1 = get_variable_numdistinct(vardata1, &isdefault1);
    nd2 = get_variable_numdistinct(vardata2, &isdefault2);
 
+   opfuncoid = OidIsValid(operator) ? get_opcode(operator) : InvalidOid;
+
    /*
     * We clamp nd2 to be not more than what we estimate the inner relation's
     * size to be.  This is intuitively somewhat reasonable since obviously
@@ -2471,18 +2490,21 @@ eqjoinsel_semi(Oid operator,
 
    if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata1->statsTuple))
    {
+       /* note we allow use of nullfrac regardless of security check */
        stats1 = (Form_pg_statistic) GETSTRUCT(vardata1->statsTuple);
-       have_mcvs1 = get_attstatsslot(vardata1->statsTuple,
-                                     vardata1->atttype,
-                                     vardata1->atttypmod,
-                                     STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
-                                     InvalidOid,
-                                     NULL,
-                                     &values1, &nvalues1,
-                                     &numbers1, &nnumbers1);
+       if (statistic_proc_security_check(vardata1, opfuncoid))
+           have_mcvs1 = get_attstatsslot(vardata1->statsTuple,
+                                         vardata1->atttype,
+                                         vardata1->atttypmod,
+                                         STATISTIC_KIND_MCV,
+                                         InvalidOid,
+                                         NULL,
+                                         &values1, &nvalues1,
+                                         &numbers1, &nnumbers1);
    }
 
-   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata2->statsTuple))
+   if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata2->statsTuple) &&
+       statistic_proc_security_check(vardata2, opfuncoid))
    {
        have_mcvs2 = get_attstatsslot(vardata2->statsTuple,
                                      vardata2->atttype,
@@ -2524,7 +2546,7 @@ eqjoinsel_semi(Oid operator,
         */
        clamped_nvalues2 = Min(nvalues2, nd2);
 
-       fmgr_info(get_opcode(operator), &eqproc);
+       fmgr_info(opfuncoid, &eqproc);
        hasmatch1 = (bool *) palloc0(nvalues1 * sizeof(bool));
        hasmatch2 = (bool *) palloc0(clamped_nvalues2 * sizeof(bool));
 
@@ -4278,6 +4300,9 @@ get_join_variables(PlannerInfo *root, List *args, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo,
  *     this query.  (Caution: this should be trusted for statistical
  *     purposes only, since we do not check indimmediate nor verify that
  *     the exact same definition of equality applies.)
+ * acl_ok: TRUE if current user has permission to read the column(s)
+ *     underlying the pg_statistic entry.  This is consulted by
+ *     statistic_proc_security_check().
  *
  * Caller is responsible for doing ReleaseVariableStats() before exiting.
  */
@@ -4446,6 +4471,30 @@ examine_variable(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int varRelid,
                                                Int16GetDatum(pos + 1),
                                                BoolGetDatum(false));
                            vardata->freefunc = ReleaseSysCache;
+
+                           if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple))
+                           {
+                               /* Get index's table for permission check */
+                               RangeTblEntry *rte;
+
+                               rte = planner_rt_fetch(index->rel->relid, root);
+                               Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);
+
+                               /*
+                                * For simplicity, we insist on the whole
+                                * table being selectable, rather than trying
+                                * to identify which column(s) the index
+                                * depends on.
+                                */
+                               vardata->acl_ok =
+                                   (pg_class_aclcheck(rte->relid, GetUserId(),
+                                                ACL_SELECT) == ACLCHECK_OK);
+                           }
+                           else
+                           {
+                               /* suppress leakproofness checks later */
+                               vardata->acl_ok = true;
+                           }
                        }
                        if (vardata->statsTuple)
                            break;
@@ -4498,6 +4547,21 @@ examine_simple_variable(PlannerInfo *root, Var *var,
                                              Int16GetDatum(var->varattno),
                                              BoolGetDatum(rte->inh));
        vardata->freefunc = ReleaseSysCache;
+
+       if (HeapTupleIsValid(vardata->statsTuple))
+       {
+           /* check if user has permission to read this column */
+           vardata->acl_ok =
+               (pg_class_aclcheck(rte->relid, GetUserId(),
+                                  ACL_SELECT) == ACLCHECK_OK) ||
+               (pg_attribute_aclcheck(rte->relid, var->varattno, GetUserId(),
+                                      ACL_SELECT) == ACLCHECK_OK);
+       }
+       else
+       {
+           /* suppress any possible leakproofness checks later */
+           vardata->acl_ok = true;
+       }
    }
    else if (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && !rte->inh)
    {
@@ -4614,6 +4678,30 @@ examine_simple_variable(PlannerInfo *root, Var *var,
    }
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check whether it is permitted to call func_oid passing some of the
+ * pg_statistic data in vardata.  We allow this either if the user has SELECT
+ * privileges on the table or column underlying the pg_statistic data or if
+ * the function is marked leak-proof.
+ */
+bool
+statistic_proc_security_check(VariableStatData *vardata, Oid func_oid)
+{
+   if (vardata->acl_ok)
+       return true;
+
+   if (!OidIsValid(func_oid))
+       return false;
+
+   if (get_func_leakproof(func_oid))
+       return true;
+
+   ereport(DEBUG2,
+           (errmsg_internal("not using statistics because function \"%s\" is not leak-proof",
+                            get_func_name(func_oid))));
+   return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * get_variable_numdistinct
  *   Estimate the number of distinct values of a variable.
@@ -4756,6 +4844,7 @@ get_variable_range(PlannerInfo *root, VariableStatData *vardata, Oid sortop,
    bool        have_data = false;
    int16       typLen;
    bool        typByVal;
+   Oid         opfuncoid;
    Datum      *values;
    int         nvalues;
    int         i;
@@ -4778,6 +4867,17 @@ get_variable_range(PlannerInfo *root, VariableStatData *vardata, Oid sortop,
        return false;
    }
 
+   /*
+    * If we can't apply the sortop to the stats data, just fail.  In
+    * principle, if there's a histogram and no MCVs, we could return the
+    * histogram endpoints without ever applying the sortop ... but it's
+    * probably not worth trying, because whatever the caller wants to do with
+    * the endpoints would likely fail the security check too.
+    */
+   if (!statistic_proc_security_check(vardata,
+                                      (opfuncoid = get_opcode(sortop))))
+       return false;
+
    get_typlenbyval(vardata->atttype, &typLen, &typByVal);
 
    /*
@@ -4830,7 +4930,7 @@ get_variable_range(PlannerInfo *root, VariableStatData *vardata, Oid sortop,
        bool        tmax_is_mcv = false;
        FmgrInfo    opproc;
 
-       fmgr_info(get_opcode(sortop), &opproc);
+       fmgr_info(opfuncoid, &opproc);
 
        for (i = 0; i < nvalues; i++)
        {
index 161c16b34f57176714d2c1bd4700473cf71c8afb..d4e5137efe75b6385a7116512d3c8c6de7027ec2 100644 (file)
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ typedef struct VariableStatData
    Oid         atttype;        /* type to pass to get_attstatsslot */
    int32       atttypmod;      /* typmod to pass to get_attstatsslot */
    bool        isunique;       /* matches unique index or DISTINCT clause */
+   bool        acl_ok;         /* result of ACL check on table or column */
 } VariableStatData;
 
 #define ReleaseVariableStats(vardata)  \
@@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT get_index_stats_hook_type get_index_stats_hook;
 
 extern void examine_variable(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int varRelid,
                 VariableStatData *vardata);
+extern bool statistic_proc_security_check(VariableStatData *vardata, Oid func_oid);
 extern bool get_restriction_variable(PlannerInfo *root, List *args,
                         int varRelid,
                         VariableStatData *vardata, Node **other,
index 16b1ea7f250472a71e9d6bf19ecbd78b648a620f..acb477717077caacb234f68692f2b50ba8a82165 100644 (file)
@@ -184,6 +184,103 @@ SELECT * FROM atest1; -- ok
  1 | two
 (2 rows)
 
+-- test leaky-function protections in selfuncs
+-- regressuser1 will own a table and provide a view for it.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser1;
+CREATE TABLE atest12 as
+  SELECT x AS a, 10001 - x AS b FROM generate_series(1,10000) x;
+CREATE INDEX ON atest12 (a);
+CREATE INDEX ON atest12 (abs(a));
+VACUUM ANALYZE atest12;
+CREATE FUNCTION leak(integer,integer) RETURNS boolean
+  AS $$begin return $1 < $2; end$$
+  LANGUAGE plpgsql immutable;
+CREATE OPERATOR <<< (procedure = leak, leftarg = integer, rightarg = integer,
+                     restrict = scalarltsel);
+-- view with leaky operator
+CREATE VIEW atest12v AS
+  SELECT * FROM atest12 WHERE b <<< 5;
+GRANT SELECT ON atest12v TO PUBLIC;
+-- This plan should use nestloop, knowing that few rows will be selected.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+                   QUERY PLAN                    
+-------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop
+   ->  Seq Scan on atest12 atest12_1
+         Filter: (b <<< 5)
+   ->  Index Scan using atest12_a_idx on atest12
+         Index Cond: (a = atest12_1.b)
+         Filter: (b <<< 5)
+(6 rows)
+
+-- And this one.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 x, atest12 y
+  WHERE x.a = y.b and abs(y.a) <<< 5;
+                    QUERY PLAN                     
+---------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop
+   ->  Seq Scan on atest12 y
+         Filter: (abs(a) <<< 5)
+   ->  Index Scan using atest12_a_idx on atest12 x
+         Index Cond: (a = y.b)
+(5 rows)
+
+-- Check if regressuser2 can break security.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser2;
+CREATE FUNCTION leak2(integer,integer) RETURNS boolean
+  AS $$begin raise notice 'leak % %', $1, $2; return $1 > $2; end$$
+  LANGUAGE plpgsql immutable;
+CREATE OPERATOR >>> (procedure = leak2, leftarg = integer, rightarg = integer,
+                     restrict = scalargtsel);
+-- This should not show any "leak" notices before failing.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 WHERE a >>> 0;
+ERROR:  permission denied for relation atest12
+-- This plan should use hashjoin, as it will expect many rows to be selected.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+                QUERY PLAN                 
+-------------------------------------------
+ Hash Join
+   Hash Cond: (atest12.a = atest12_1.b)
+   ->  Seq Scan on atest12
+         Filter: (b <<< 5)
+   ->  Hash
+         ->  Seq Scan on atest12 atest12_1
+               Filter: (b <<< 5)
+(7 rows)
+
+-- Now regressuser1 grants sufficient access to regressuser2.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser1;
+GRANT SELECT (a, b) ON atest12 TO PUBLIC;
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser2;
+-- Now regressuser2 will also get a good row estimate.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+                   QUERY PLAN                    
+-------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop
+   ->  Seq Scan on atest12 atest12_1
+         Filter: (b <<< 5)
+   ->  Index Scan using atest12_a_idx on atest12
+         Index Cond: (a = atest12_1.b)
+         Filter: (b <<< 5)
+(6 rows)
+
+-- But not for this, due to lack of table-wide permissions needed
+-- to make use of the expression index's statistics.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 x, atest12 y
+  WHERE x.a = y.b and abs(y.a) <<< 5;
+              QUERY PLAN              
+--------------------------------------
+ Hash Join
+   Hash Cond: (x.a = y.b)
+   ->  Seq Scan on atest12 x
+   ->  Hash
+         ->  Seq Scan on atest12 y
+               Filter: (abs(a) <<< 5)
+(6 rows)
+
+-- clean up (regressuser1's objects are all dropped later)
+DROP FUNCTION leak2(integer, integer) CASCADE;
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to operator >>>(integer,integer)
 -- groups
 SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser3;
 CREATE TABLE atest3 (one int, two int, three int);
index e71ade178dec5b8f43b8427b448cfb4c7f438ff6..9aa9b40a46cead23e843b0e14ee160659d49a9e1 100644 (file)
@@ -127,6 +127,67 @@ bar    true
 SELECT * FROM atest1; -- ok
 
 
+-- test leaky-function protections in selfuncs
+
+-- regressuser1 will own a table and provide a view for it.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser1;
+
+CREATE TABLE atest12 as
+  SELECT x AS a, 10001 - x AS b FROM generate_series(1,10000) x;
+CREATE INDEX ON atest12 (a);
+CREATE INDEX ON atest12 (abs(a));
+VACUUM ANALYZE atest12;
+
+CREATE FUNCTION leak(integer,integer) RETURNS boolean
+  AS $$begin return $1 < $2; end$$
+  LANGUAGE plpgsql immutable;
+CREATE OPERATOR <<< (procedure = leak, leftarg = integer, rightarg = integer,
+                     restrict = scalarltsel);
+
+-- view with leaky operator
+CREATE VIEW atest12v AS
+  SELECT * FROM atest12 WHERE b <<< 5;
+GRANT SELECT ON atest12v TO PUBLIC;
+
+-- This plan should use nestloop, knowing that few rows will be selected.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+
+-- And this one.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 x, atest12 y
+  WHERE x.a = y.b and abs(y.a) <<< 5;
+
+-- Check if regressuser2 can break security.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser2;
+
+CREATE FUNCTION leak2(integer,integer) RETURNS boolean
+  AS $$begin raise notice 'leak % %', $1, $2; return $1 > $2; end$$
+  LANGUAGE plpgsql immutable;
+CREATE OPERATOR >>> (procedure = leak2, leftarg = integer, rightarg = integer,
+                     restrict = scalargtsel);
+
+-- This should not show any "leak" notices before failing.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 WHERE a >>> 0;
+
+-- This plan should use hashjoin, as it will expect many rows to be selected.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+
+-- Now regressuser1 grants sufficient access to regressuser2.
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser1;
+GRANT SELECT (a, b) ON atest12 TO PUBLIC;
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser2;
+
+-- Now regressuser2 will also get a good row estimate.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12v x, atest12v y WHERE x.a = y.b;
+
+-- But not for this, due to lack of table-wide permissions needed
+-- to make use of the expression index's statistics.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT * FROM atest12 x, atest12 y
+  WHERE x.a = y.b and abs(y.a) <<< 5;
+
+-- clean up (regressuser1's objects are all dropped later)
+DROP FUNCTION leak2(integer, integer) CASCADE;
+
+
 -- groups
 
 SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser3;