Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.

We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions.  Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency.  Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.

Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us

diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
index 13058cf7bf762600299d12228dbdc6b829011cc5..49832c50c5365db17ac747d0ec3883ab799e0cf4 100644 (file)
--- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
 }
 
 int
-rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3])
+rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
 {
    int         mdy_int[3];
 
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, const char *fmt, char *str)
 }
 
 int
-rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d)
+rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
 {
    int         mdy_int[3];