Coverity complained about an apparent missing "break" in a switch
added by
bb140506df605fab. The human-readable comments are pretty
clear that this is intentional, but add a standard /* FALL THRU */
comment to make it clear to tools too.
* treat OP_PHRASE as OP_AND with recheck requirement
*/
*gcv->need_recheck = true;
+ /* FALL THRU */
case OP_AND:
val1 = TS_execute_ternary(gcv, curitem + curitem->qoperator.left);