Skip to content

Retire the "Streamlined Publication Approval" system #856

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
frivoal opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Retire the "Streamlined Publication Approval" system #856

frivoal opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Topic: Simplifications

Comments

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Apr 18, 2024

I believe that Streamlined Publication Approval is unused.

The motivation for this Process feature is described at the begining of the section:

In order to streamline the publication process in non-controversial cases, verification of an update request is automatically granted without formal review when the following additional criteria are fulfilled: […]

Note: These criteria are intentionally stricter than the general requirements for an update request. This is in order to minimize ambiguities and the need for expert judgment, and to make self-evaluation practical.

In practice, nobody has found it useful to place the additional burden on themselves to document that all additional criteria are fulfilled in order to save a little bit of time by spiking verification of the update request, nor requested improved tooling to make that easier. (@plh, could you confirm?)

We should admit that this is a failed experiment, and remove it from the Process. Rules about REC track transitions are complicated enough without confusing people with irrelevant clauses.

@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Topic: Simplifications labels Apr 18, 2024
@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

Data would certainly be helpful here. This is ringing tiny bells for me that we may once have either used it or relied on the possibility of using it, in order to make a decision.

@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

I think what's happened is that the standard process has been streamlined enough that we don't need to implement this additional system. :) So +1 to removing it.

@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Retire "Streamlined Publication Approval", and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLVED: Accept PR 857 to delete "Streamlined Publication Approval"
The full IRC log of that discussion Subtopic: Retire "Streamlined Publication Approval"
github: https://github.com//issues/856
-> https://github.com//pull/857
florian: When we did Process 2020, we tried to make some transition requests easier because at the time it took a long time
... we introduced a stricter path in the Process, that doesn't require the Director's decision
... but nobody used this
fantasai: also we streamlined getting manual approval a lot
florian: overall REC track is long and complicated, this chapter doesn't help much and just confuses people
... suggestion is to delete
+1
+1
plh: +1
RESOLVED: Accept PR 857 to delete "Streamlined Publication Approval"

@css-meeting-bot css-meeting-bot removed the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Apr 24, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Apr 25, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024 milestone Apr 25, 2024
@frivoal frivoal closed this as completed Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Topic: Simplifications
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants