Skip to content

ambiguous statement for proxy in WG/IG #373

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
koalie opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

ambiguous statement for proxy in WG/IG #373

koalie opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Comments

@koalie
Copy link
Contributor

koalie commented Feb 17, 2020

Section " 5.2.1. Working Group and Interest Group Participation Requirements" contains:

As a courtesy to the group, if the substitute is not well-versed in the group’s discussions, the regular participant should authorize another participant to act as proxy for votes.

It isn't clear to me whether this introduces a 3rd individual, in addition to the regular participant and the substitute.

Also, it isn't obvious to me why this is a courtesy to the group. As courtesy to a group, I'd expect more something along a heads-up or notification of a situation.

@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor

I think it's suggesting that if you send a newby substitute, don't give them your proxy, but instead have an old hand proxy your vote. When was the last time we had a formal proxy in a WG? Suggest we leave this alone.

@koalie
Copy link
Contributor Author

koalie commented Feb 17, 2020

Ah, got it!
I'd suggest disambiguating by using "[...]authorize another participant instead,".

@frivoal frivoal added this to the Deferred milestone Mar 11, 2020
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Mar 11, 2020

This is not necessarily editorial, depending on how people read the original sentence, and applies to a part of the process that isn't new in the 2020 cycle. As agreed with the CG chair, marking it as deferred, to handle it in a subsequent cycle.

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

fantasai commented Dec 4, 2024

... I think we should just remove this sentence, I don't see what purpose it's serving.

Alternatively, delete the sentence and modify the previous sentence to allow either the substitute or another participant to proxy the vote (presumably for cases where you don't have a substitute; I'm not sure why you'd pick someone else if you have a substitute...).

@fantasai fantasai added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Dec 4, 2024
@frivoal frivoal modified the milestones: Deferred, Process 2024/2025 Dec 4, 2024
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Ambiguous proxy statement, and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
The full IRC log of that discussion Topic: Ambiguous proxy statement
florian: Coralie pointed out an ambiguous phrase [quotes]
github: https://github.com//issues/373
florian: One suggestion from fantasai is to just delete the sentence
[discussion about what this section is about]
fantasai: We have a separate paragraph about proxy votes, apparently, so should just delete this sentence
plh: Objections to removing sentence starting "As a courtesy"
RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".

@css-meeting-bot css-meeting-bot removed the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Jan 22, 2025
@frivoal frivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants