From: | Decibel! |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development list |
Subject: | dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used |
Date: | 2007-10-18 14:09:19 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Is it intentional that dblink's unnamed connections don't get re-used?
stats=# select datname, usename from pg_stat_activity;
datname | usename
---------+---------
stats | decibel
(1 row)
stats=# select dblink_connect('dbname=stats');
dblink_connect
----------------
OK
(1 row)
stats=# select dblink_connect('dbname=postgres');
dblink_connect
----------------
OK
(1 row)
stats=# select datname, usename from pg_stat_activity;
datname | usename
----------+----------
stats | decibel
stats | postgres
postgres | postgres
(3 rows)
AFAIK there's no way I could possibly use or refer to the connection
to stats at this point; so why doesn't dblink close it when I issue
the second connect?
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-10-18 14:09:36 | Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-18 13:56:38 | Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions |